Invited
Speaker
Structure Based Pharmacophore
Design in Computer Aided Drug Discovery
R. Raghu
India
Computer-aided drug design techniques such as ligand based pharmacophore
modeling and structure-based protein ligand docking have become an
integral part of drug discovery. Research organizations in both industry
and academia use these techniques to aid in the efficient discovery
and design of active molecules. Large compound databases can be screened
computationally to reduce the number of compounds for bioassay screens,
thereby saving time and resources.
Ligand-based technologies, such as 2D fingerprint similarity searching,
shape-based screening, and 3D-pharmacophore modeling are traditionally
recognized as fast methods for screening large compound databases.
Structure-based approaches, on the other hand, are generally more
computationally expensive but can lead to structural insights and
have been shown to yield more diverse actives.
It is thus of particular relevance to drug discovery campaigns involving
targets that are difficult to crystallize, such as ion channels, transporters,
or G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs).
Screening a 3D database against a pharmacophore hypothesis is generally
more computationally efficient than structure-based docking, which
involves many energy evaluations as part of the conformational searching
and scoring process. Recently, methods have emerged that attempt to
capitalize on the speed of pharmacophore screening coupled with structure-based
information by developing pharmacophore hypotheses derived from protein-ligand
complexes.These methods show promise and have been used to discover
novel leads.
We describe a novel method to develop energetically optimized, structure-based
pharmacophores for use in rapid in silico screening. We derive energy-optimized
pharmacophore hypotheses for 30 pharmaceutically relevant crystal
structures and screen a database to assess the enrichment of active
compounds. The method is compared to three other approaches: (1) pharmacophore
hypotheses derived from a systematic assessment of receptor-ligand
contacts, (2) Glide SP docking, and (3) 2D ligand fingerprint similarity.
The method developed here shows better enrichments than the other
three methods and yields a greater diversity of actives than the contact-based
pharmacophores or the 2D ligand similarity. Docking produces the most
cases (28/30) with enrichments greater than 10.0 in the top 1% of
the database and on average produces the greatest diversity of active
molecules. The combination of energy terms from a structure-based
analysis with the speed of a ligand-based pharmacophore search results
in a method that leverages the strengths of both approaches to produce
high enrichments with a good diversity of active molecules.
|