The 2nd International Conference on Drug Discovery & Therapy: Dubai, February 1 - 4, 2010


Poster Presenter

Pharmacokinetics and Toxicity Profile Of Bendamustine In Patients With Impaired Liver Function.
Preiss R. Teichert J., Athmani A., Dollinger M., Preiss S, Schoppmeyer K., Thermann P. Zipprich A.
Germany

Bendamustine, a highly effective anti-cancer agent against malignant lymphoproliferative disorders was developed in Germany and has been approved in Germany as RibomustinT for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL), as first-line combination therapy of advanced indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL), and for the treatment of advanced multiple myeloma. In 2008, bendamustine received US FDA as TreandaT for the initial therapy of CLL and the treatment of indolent B-cell NHL that has progressed during or within six months of treatment with a regimen that included rituximab. There are numerous clinical trials currently under way to optimize the combination therapy and the treatment benefit mainly for patients with lymphoproliferative disorders.

Bendamustine, primarily a bifunctional alkylating agent, provides a unique cytotoxic mechanism hypothetically due to an additional purine antimetabolite mechanism of action. Bendamustine undergoes extensive hepatic metabolism and elimination. To date, we identified 16 different phase I metabolites and conjugates considerably contributing to biliary excretion of bendamustine in tumour patients (1, 2). There is no formal study to assess the effect of liver impairment on the pharmacokinetics and toxicity of bendamustine in cancer patients and dosing recommendation as well in the scientific literature up to now.

In a phase II study evaluating the clinical activity of bendamustine in 13 Child-Pugh A and B class patients (11 m/2 f) with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and disturbed liver function, some of them pre-treated with sorafenib, the pharmacokinetics of B and its metabolites and the bendamustine related toxicity have been investigated. In HCC patients, CT and MRI technique revealed moderate or strong tumour involvement of the liver and the mean levels of GGT and SGOT were elevated 10-fold and those of bilirubin 2.5-fold compared to the reference group. Reference group included 12 patients (5 m/7 f) with various tumour types of non-hepatic origin resistant to all other therapies. All the subjects in both groups had normal renal function. Bendamustine HCl 120 mg/m2 was given intravenously, daily for 2 consecutive days. Plasma concentrations of bendamustine and its metabolites were determined using a validated HPLC assay with fluorescence detection. Toxicity was scored over 4 weeks according to NIH/NCI criteria. B clearance tended to decrease in HCC (mean values: 304 vs. 639 ml/min, non-significantly). Mean terminal half-life of B was significantly prolonged in subjects with hepatic impairment (47 vs. 33 min. p < 0.01). Subjects with HCC had significantly lower (p < 0.05) plasma concentrations of gamma-hydroxy-bendamustine (equi-effective with bendamustine) and showed a trend towards decreased plasma concentrations of N-desmethyl-bendamustine (10-fold less active than bendamustine) compared to the reference group. However, the plasma concentration of both phase I metabolites was only 5% of that of the parent compound. Pharmacokinetics of the monohydrolysis product of bendamustine did not differ in both groups. Leukopenia, thrombocytopenia (nadirs on day 21) and lymphopenia (nadir on day 7) were significantly induced in HCC patients. Eleven of them had grade 3 and 4 lymphopenia. Non-haematological toxicity was mild and not significantly different between both groups. The most frequently reported adverse events associated with bendamustine treatment were dry mouth (68%), nausea (44%) and dysgeusia (24%).

Based on these data, we would suggest a stepwise dose reduction up to 30-40% in subjects with moderately to strongly impaired liver function related to serum total bilirubin levels in the range from 1.3 to 3.0 mg/dl.

(1) Teichert J, Sohr R, Baumann F, Hennig L, Merkle K, Caca K and Preiss R (2005) Drug Metab Dispos 33: 984-992

(2) Teichert J, Sohr R, Hennig L, Baumann F, Schoppmeyer K, Patzak U, Preiss R (2009) Drug Metab Dispos 37: 292-301













[Webmaster]   Copyright © 2010 2nd International Conference on Drug Design & Therapy